I'll try to incorporate both into the continuation of that discussion, which I hope to pick up again very soon.
First, there's a very interesting article in June's Wired Magazine, which features a discussion of the New New Economy. The article is called "The New Socialism: Global Collectivist Society Is Coming Online." Its title is sure to provoke a negative response from Americans who for sixty years have been taught to recoil at the mere mention of the "S" word. Getting beyond that first reaction, it's very much worth reading for its examination of the new forms of social media and how they are creating a greater tendency toward and preference for collaboration and collective action.
The next idea that caught my fancy is the concept of Biocentrism that a friend referenced in a Tweet last week. Below is a passage pulled from Wikipedia that lays out the main points, but I encourage you to read the full article on Biocentrism:
According to Robert Lanza biocentrism has seven principles.
1. What we perceive as reality is a process that involves our consciousness. An "external" reality, if it existed, would by definition have to exist in space. But this is meaningless, because space and time are not absolute realities but rather tools of the human and animal mind.
2. Our external and internal perceptions are inextricably intertwined. They are different sides of the same coin and cannot be divorced from one another.
3. The behavior of subatomic particles, indeed all particles and objects, is inextricably linked to the presence of an observer. Without the presence of a conscious observer, they at best exist in an undetermined state of probability waves.
4. Without consciousness, "matter" dwells in an undetermined state of probability. Any universe that could have preceded consciousness only existed in a probability state.
5. The structure of the universe is explainable only through biocentrism. The universe is fine-tuned for life, which makes perfect sense as life creates the universe, not the other way around. The "universe" is simply the complete spatio-temporal logic of the self.
6. Time does not have a real existence outside of animal-sense perception. It is the process by which we perceive changes in the universe.
7. Space, like time, is not an object or a thing. Space is another form of our animal understanding and does not have an independent reality. We carry space and time around with us like turtles with shells. Thus, there is no absolute self-existing matrix in which physical events occur independent of life.
6 comments:
Lovely Post! Impressive blog! You have a gift! Congratulations!
Best wishes,
Rosana
@LiR Thanks so much for the visit and the very kind comment.
I like the biocentrism idea a lot. I do wonder, of course, as a non-academic, what use these philosophical concepts can be put to, when most people live and die believing that space and time are self-existing realities.
And if indeed most people believe something, does that by the principles of biocentrism - which seems to suggest a reality created only by human thought - make it a reality in itself?
Hi Francis,
I have also read somewhere , that we - humans, are sometimes not aware that our universe is eternal and that we are only temporary travelers, that time does not really move; that the universe and everything around us is eternal.
The energy form only changes from one to another.
There are also some hypothesis that we are particles of one supreme "consciousness" and any "one particle" does, affects the "whole".
I have noticed too that the mere mention of the word S oftentimes makes most Americans nervous. A Catholic president who is perceived as more or less a "communist" is feared.
Perhaps the concept that he may institute social reforms towards common classes, etc - which would kill free enterprise - is what most are afraid of.
Of course, this is far from the truth because Catholicism and communism are two different tenets.
Man exists in a universe he creates in his mind, up to what extent? Up to the extent that he would like to believe.
Have a nice weekend, Francis.
@Fiendish I think the challenge is to break down such academically worded philosophical concepts into terms people can understand. Using the power of story and metaphor to try to communicate the ideas would be an interesting exercise. I need to read up on it a bit further, and understand it better. What appeals to me is the urge to get away from a traditional anthropocentric view of the universe.
@Jena I like those concepts. I think there's much truth to that hypothesis of a supreme consciousness. Have a great weekend too :)
Nice post. I love thinking about consciousnes and it is amazing to me how little we actually know about something so basic to our experience. If we could talk to fish would we discover that they have no concept of what water is? It seems to me we could progress in leaps and bounds - far beyond our wildest imaginings - if we could get a grasp on what this consciousness is.
Loved the food thoughts too.
thanks
Randy
Post a Comment